Timeline for answer to Is it possible to find individual estimates for phase and magnitude in this communication problem? by Martin Modrák
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 hours ago | history | edited | Martin Modrák | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Accomodated clarifications in the question
|
| 10 hours ago | comment | added | Martin Modrák | @Userhanu oh, that didn't occur to me - thought that that's something analogous for time. Yeah, than you know it and I will edit the answer to reflect that. | |
| 15 hours ago | comment | added | Userhanu | Furthermore, by $j_i$ you mean $\theta_i$ (Phase), right? Because $j=\sqrt{-1}$ in my question, I have edited it. | |
| 15 hours ago | comment | added | Userhanu | Thanks. I am performing Bayesian estimation of $h$ for a single pair of $y$ and $\bar{x}$ and I have used priors for phase and magnitude distribution of $h$. So I think my case is (1) and the data do not let me disentangle phase and magnitude (and noise) at all. So, I believe I am correct then no separate estimates exit? However, is there some more mathematical justification for scenario (1)? | |
| 15 hours ago | history | answered | Martin Modrák | CC BY-SA 4.0 |